Spirituality/Religion Among First Responders With and Without Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Alcohol Misuse.

Objective: To examine the co-occurrence of alcohol misuse and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and potential sources of coping (e.g., spirituality/religion) and clinically relevant variables among first responders (e.g., firefighters, law enforcement corrections officers, paramedics). Method: We assessed rates of independent and co-occurring alcohol misuse and PTSD among a national online sample of 320 first responders as well as the prevalence and salience of S/R, guilt, shame, moral injury, aspects of S/R, and treatment interest. Results: In our sample, 46.88% (n = 150) met criteria for comorbid alcohol misuse and probable PTSD and individuals with these comorbid conditions reported significantly greater negative religious coping, moral injury, and shame than all other diagnostic groups (i.e., independent alcohol misuse, independent PTSD, and neither). Correlations also revealed significant relationships between alcohol misuse and PTSD symptomatology with positive and negative religious coping, moral injury, shame, guilt, interest in treatment, and interest in spiritually integrated treatment. Conclusions: Findings highlight the high rates of independent and co-occurring alcohol misuse and PTSD among first responders as well as the salience of S/R in this population.

Protocol for harmonization of randomized trials testing the addition of behavioral therapy to buprenorphine for opioid use disorder.

Background: Although buprenorphine is an effective treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD), much remains to be understood about treatment non-response and methods for improving treatment retention. The addition of behavioral therapies to buprenorphine has not yielded consistent benefits for opioid outcomes, on average. However, several studies suggest that certain subgroups may benefit from the combination of buprenorphine and behavioral therapy, highlighting the potential for personalized approaches to treatment. Furthermore, little is known about whether behavioral therapies improve buprenorphine retention or non-opioid (e.g., functional) outcomes. Methods: The objective of this project is to harmonize four previously conducted clinical trials testing the addition of behavioral therapy to buprenorphine maintenance for OUD and to use this larger dataset to answer critical clinical questions about the role of behavioral therapy in this population. Study aims include identifying potential moderators of the effect of the addition of behavioral therapy and quantifying the effect of behavioral therapy on buprenorphine retention and functional outcomes. Results: Analyses will consider outcomes of weeks of opioid use, weeks of retention in buprenorphine treatment, and functional outcomes as measured by the Addiction Severity Index. Analyses will include an indicator for each study to account for heterogeneity of samples and design. Conclusion: Results will help to inform clinical and research efforts to optimize the use of behavioral therapies in the treatment of OUD.

Cognitive behavioral therapy for anxiety and opioid use disorder: Development and pilot testing.

INTRODUCTION: Anxiety disorders are highly prevalent among people with opioid use disorder (OUD), and they have a negative impact on disorder course and treatment outcomes. The objective of this Stage 1 A/1B behavioral treatment development trial was to develop a novel cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) protocol for co-occurring anxiety disorders and OUD. METHODS: Following a period of iterative manual development involving patient interviews and feedback from content experts, we tested a 12-session individual CBT protocol in a small, open pilot trial (N = 5). This was followed by a small, randomized controlled trial (N = 32), comparing the new protocol to 12 sessions of manualized Individual Drug Counseling. All participants also received medication for OUD. RESULTS: Overall, support for feasibility and acceptability was strong, based on recruitment and retention rates and patient satisfaction ratings. Within-subjects results identified 11-point reductions in anxiety symptom severity (on a 0-56 point scale); these gains were sustained through 3 months of follow-up. However, these changes did not differ between randomized conditions. With respect to opioid outcomes, 85 % of participants were abstinent in the prior month at the end of treatment. Opioid use outcomes also did not differ by treatment condition. CONCLUSIONS: These results support the feasibility and acceptability of a CBT protocol for co-occurring anxiety and OUD. However, in this small pilot trial results do not show an initial benefit over an evidence-based psychosocial treatment targeted to OUD alone, in combination with medication for OUD.

Examination of the mild, moderate, and severe alcohol use disorder severity indicators using a nationally representative sample.

OBJECTIVE: The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fifth edition conceptualizes alcohol use disorder (AUD) as a single continuum with indicators to denote the level of severity along this spectrum with the presence of 2-3, 4-5, or 6 + symptoms indicating mild, moderate, and severe AUD, respectively. However, despite the labels of these indicators, it remains unclear how individuals compare across these indicators, both in terms of AUD severity, but also risk for other related problems (e.g., depression). METHOD: Confirmatory factor analysis was conducted on past year AUD symptoms to obtain estimates of latent AUD severity using data from the 2020 National Survey on Drug Use and Health (unweighted n = 31,941). The range and distribution of latent trait estimates were then compared across AUD diagnostic statuses (i.e., no AUD, mild, moderate, and severe). Multinomial regressions were then used to compare diagnostic groups based on alcohol use, problems with other substances, treatment utilization, and mental/physical health. RESULTS: Results indicated very limited overlap in latent severity estimates between individuals with different severity indicators. Multinomial regression results demonstrated that some measures increased in a roughly stepwise fashion across AUD indicators (e.g., alcohol use and drinking behavior), while many did not. CONCLUSIONS: Results partially support the current AUD indicators as AUD severity and co-occurring problems did broadly increase across the indicators. However, the present study also explores several ways to improve these indicators in future AUD formulations. For example, having indicators that account not only for the quantitative but also the qualitative differences in AUD presentation at different severity levels. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

Toward a Psychological Model of Chemical Coping with Opioids in Cancer Care.

LEARNING OBJECTIVES AFTER PARTICIPATING IN THIS CME ACTIVITY, THE PSYCHIATRIST SHOULD BE BETTER ABLE TO: • Outline the risk factors involved with opioid accessibility in patients receiving treatment for cancer.• Identify factors to address in order to mitigate risk for opioid misuse during cancer care. ABSTRACT: Most patients with advanced cancer receive treatment for related pain. Opioid accessibility, however, is a risk factor for misuse, which can present care challenges and quality-of-life concerns. There is a lack of consistent universal screening prior to initiation of opioid prescribing. One crucial issue in treating this population is adequately identifying and mitigating risk factors driving opioid misuse. Drawing on theory and research from addiction science, psychology, palliative care, and oncology, the presented conceptual framework suggests that risk factors for opioid misuse during cancer care can be stratified into historical, current, malleable, and unmalleable factors. The framework identifies necessary factors to address in order to mitigate risk for opioid misuse during cancer care, and offers key directions for future research.

Gender differences in the prevalence of stimulant misuse in the United States: 2015-2019.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The gender gap in prevalence of substance-use disorders has narrowed. However, gender differences in stimulant misuse have not been well-characterized in recent years. The aim of this study was to quantify gender differences in past-year stimulant misuse and stimulant-use disorder, separated by stimulant type (cocaine/crack, prescription stimulants, and methamphetamine). In an exploratory aim, we investigated whether gender differences were moderated by age or sexual orientation. METHODS: We combined data from the National Survey on Drug Use and Health from 2015 to 2019 (unweighted N = 282,768) to test gender differences in the prevalence of past-year stimulant misuse. RESULTS: Results indicated that stimulant misuse was significantly more prevalent in men than women for all stimulant types for both past-year use and past-year use disorder. The magnitude of this sex difference was smallest for prescription stimulants, where men had 1.37 times higher odds of past-year misuse and no gender difference was observed in the prevalence of prescription stimulant-use disorder. The magnitude of gender differences also varied based on both age and sexual orientation. CONCLUSIONS AND SCIENTIFIC SIGNIFICANCE: Illicit stimulant misuse continues to be more common in men than in women; however, gender differences are more modest for prescription stimulant misuse, suggesting a narrowing of this historical gender difference.

An Evaluation of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Substance Use Disorder: A Systematic Review and Application of the Society of Clinical Psychology Criteria for Empirically Supported Treatments.

Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is a commonly used treatment for substance use disorders (SUDs) but has not been evaluated using the American Psychological Association's "Tolin Criteria" for determining the empirical basis of psychological treatments. The current systematic review evaluated five meta-analyses of CBT for SUD. One meta-analysis had sufficient quality to be considered in the evaluation of effect sizes. CBT produced small to moderate effects on substance use when compared to inactive treatment and was most effective at early follow-up (1-6 months post-treatment) compared to late follow-up (8+ months post-treatment). Sensitivity analyses including all five meta-analyses found similar results. A "strong recommendation" was provided for CBT as an empirically supported treatment for SUD, based on effects on substance use, quality of evidence, and consideration of contextual factors (e.g., efficacy in diverse populations).

Why do we focus on the exception and not the rule? Examining the prevalence of mono- versus polysubstance use in the general population.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Substance use disorders (SUDs) are predominantly studied as drug class specific constructs (e.g. opioid versus alcohol use disorder). Polysubstance use (PSU), or the use of two or more substances from multiple drug classes, is only captured diagnostically by the co-occurrences of drug class-specific SUDs, and in many ways is relegated to a secondary position within the literature. However, this is not consistent with mounting empirical evidence regarding the high prevalence of PSU patterns compared with a mono-use pattern (i.e. all use contained within a single-drug class). The current study measured how many individuals in the general United States population could be characterized as having a mono-use versus PSU pattern. METHODS: We measured the prevalence of mono-use versus PSU in those who used substances in the past year, those with at least two symptoms of an SUD and in those who received treatment for alcohol/drug problems in the past year using data from the National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) from years 2015-19. RESULTS: Of those who used substance(s) in the past year, 64% reported a mono-use pattern. Importantly, only 26% of those who had at least two symptoms of an SUD and 22% of those who received treatment for substance use reported a mono-use pattern. CONCLUSIONS: Although mono-use of drugs is common in the United States at the public health level, it is a much less common presentation than polysubstance use (PSU) among individuals of even mild substance use disorder severity. This means that common efforts to study substances in isolation do not focus upon the most common presentation of the phenomenon. We discuss the importance and implications of embracing a PSU framework in the study of substance misuse and substance use disorders.

Defining Prescription Drug Misuse: A Naturalistic Evaluation of National Survey on Drug Use and Health Data From 2012-2014 to 2015-2017.

OBJECTIVES: Prescription drug misuse (PDM) is a significant public health problem. As research has evolved, the definitions of misuse have varied over time, yet the implications of this variability have not been systematically studied. The objective of this study was to leverage a change in the measurement of PDM in a large population survey to identify its impact on the prevalence and correlates of this behavior. METHODS: Data from the National Survey on Drug Use and Health were compared before and after a change in the definition of PDM from one that restricted the source and motive for use to one that captured any misuse other than directed by a prescriber. Three-year cohorts were constructed, representing a restricted definition of PDM (2012-2014) and a broad definition of PDM (2015-2017). RESULTS: Segmented logistic regression models indicated a significant increase in PDM prevalence for all 3 drug types examined (opioids, tranquilizers, and sedatives). Although the magnitude of differences varied somewhat based on drug type, the broader definition was generally associated with older age, higher prevalence of health insurance, and higher odds of misusing one's own prescription. Some worsening of mental health indicators was observed, but results indicated few other clinical or substance use differences. CONCLUSIONS: Definitions of prescription drug misuse have a substantial impact on the prevalence of misuse and some impact on the characteristics of the population. Further research is needed to understand the optimal strategy for measuring this behavior, based on the scientific or public health question or interest.

An acceptance and commitment therapy-based intervention for opioid use disorder risk in individuals with cancer: A treatment development study.

This paper describes the iterative development of an evidence-based behavioral intervention for individuals with cancer at risk for opioid use disorder, using the National Institutes of Health Stage Model for Behavioral Intervention Development. Adult patients with cancer from an outpatient palliative care clinic at an academic cancer center, with moderate to high risk of opioid misuse, were enrolled in a treatment development study that aimed to increase psychological flexibility. In this intervention, psychological flexibility is the posited mechanism of change for reduction of opioid use disorder risk. Patients completed baseline (pre-intervention) assessments, a six-session behavioral intervention based in Acceptance and Commitment Therapy, post-intervention assessments, and a semi-structured exit interview. Ten patients with moderate to high risk of opioid misuse completed the intervention. Patients rated the intervention as highly acceptable and were generally highly satisfied. Patients reported finding the coping skills helpful (e.g., mindfulness, cognitive defusion) and reported a preference for more sessions. These treatment development efforts have implications for the development and design of acceptance- and mindfulness-based, targeted interventions for individuals with cancer, receiving palliative care and at risk for opioid use disorder. Specifically, this six-session behavioral intervention to increase psychological flexibility was acceptable to patients and ready to be studied in a pilot RCT.

Prevalence and correlates of the misuse of z-drugs and benzodiazepines in the National Survey on Drug Use and Health.

Background: Benzodiazepines and non-benzodiazepine hypnotics (z-drugs) are commonly prescribed for their anxiolytic and hypnotic properties, though they can also be misused. In studies examining the epidemiology of prescription drug misuse, these medication classes are commonly combined, rendering inadequate knowledge of their patterns of misuse. The objective of this study was to characterize the population prevalence, conditional dependence, and sociodemographic and clinical correlates of the misuse of benzodiazepines and z-drugs. Methods: Data from the National Survey on Drug Use and Health from 2015 to 2019 were used to estimate population-level prevalence and characteristics of benzodiazepine and z-drug misuse. Groups were derived based on past-year misuse of benzodiazepines alone, z-drugs alone, or both drug types. Unadjusted regression analyses were used to compare groups on characteristics of interest. Results: Exposure to benzodiazepines and/or z-drugs via prescription or misuse was common; however, only 2% of the population was estimated to have misused a benzodiazepine in the past year, and less than 0.5% misused z-drugs. People who misused only z-drugs were generally older, more likely to have health insurance, more educated, and had less severe psychiatric symptoms. This group was also more likely to report misuse to cope with sleep difficulty. Although concurrent substance use was highly prevalent in all groups, people who misused z-drugs alone generally reported less concurrent substance use than the other groups. Conclusion: The misuse of z-drugs is less common than benzodiazepines, and people who misuse only z-drugs appear to generally have lower clinical severity. Nonetheless, a substantial subgroup of people exposed to z-drugs report concurrent, past-year use of other substances. Further research on z-drug misuse, including consideration of whether it should be grouped with other anxiolytic/hypnotic drugs, is needed.

Assessment of the Short Grit Scale in patients with substance use disorder: Psychometric properties and patient characteristics.

Background: Recovery from substance use disorder requires sustained effort and perseverance. Hence, the resilience factor of grit may be important for people in recovery. Little research has been conducted on grit in patients with substance use disorder (SUD), especially in a large and varied sample.Objectives: To analyze the psychometric properties of the Short Grit Scale (Grit-S) in patients with SUD and to use demographic and clinical characteristics to predict variance in Grit-S scores.Methods: Participants completed the Grit-S and other self-report measures. Psychometric properties of the Grit-S were assessed in outpatients (N = 94, 77.7% male) and a hierarchical regression predicted Grit-S variance in inpatients (N = 1238, 65.0% male).Results: The Grit-S demonstrated good internal consistency (α=.75) and strong test-retest reliability (adjusted r = .79, p < .001). Mean Grit-S score was 3.15, lower than other clinical samples reported in the literature. Regression modeling indicated a moderate, statistically significant association between demographic and clinical characteristics and Grit-S scores (R2 = 15.5%, p < .001). Of particular interest, the positive factor of recovery protection showed the strongest association with Grit-S of all variables assessed (ß=.185 vs. ß = .052-.175 for the remaining significant independent variables).Conclusion: The psychometric properties of the Grit-S in patients with SUD support its use in this population. Moreover, the particularly low grit scores among inpatients with SUDs and the association of grit scores with substance use risk and recovery factors suggest that grit could be useful as a treatment target in this population.

Alcohol Treatment Access and Engagement Among Women in the USA: a Targeted Review of the Literature 2012-2022.

Purpose of Review: The purpose of this review is to examine recent literature (2012-2022) on alcohol treatment access and engagement in women in the U.S. and propose future directions for research and clinical practice. Recent Findings: A targeted literature review resulted in 27 studies encompassing screening and brief intervention (SBIRT), treatment utilization, treatment engagement, and barriers to treatment. Recent literature demonstrates overall low rates of screening and brief interventions and treatment utilization in the population with women less likely to be screened and utilize alcohol treatment. The magnitude of these gender differences varies with race/ethnicity. Extensive barriers to care include provider knowledge, structural barriers, and attitudinal barriers and these vary with service setting, gender, and race/ethnicity. Summary: There is an increasing prevalence of alcohol use and Alcohol Use Disorder (AUD) in women with low rates of screening, brief treatment, treatment, and engagement which have resulted from extensive barriers to care. Possible areas of further inquiry include the impact of race/ethnicity on gender differences, improving provider and system level policies to promote SBIRT and treatment engagement and utilization, further developing digital interventions, and implementation research to investigate factors associated with optimizing effectiveness of gender-responsive and culturally tailored interventions that address the unique needs of women.

Correlates of optimism among patients in substance use disorder inpatient treatment.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Early recovery from substance use disorder (SUD) is often characterized by hopelessness and despair about the future. Optimism, or the expectation that good things will happen, may provide a buffer against despair, and motivate adaptive goal engagement and coping. Study objectives were to (1) compare levels of optimism among individuals in substance use disorder inpatient treatment to other populations and (2) examine correlates of optimism. METHODS: This exploratory study utilized a cross-sectional survey design. Participants (n = 355) completed self-report measures assessing sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. The main variable of interest, optimism, was assessed by Life Orientation Test-Revised scores. Multivariate regression was used to examine the association among sociodemographic and clinical variables and optimism. RESULTS: Our sample (n = 342) scored lower on optimism (mean = 11.7) than general population and SUD patients reported in the literature (range = 13.0-18.5). Optimism was higher for SUD inpatients who were college-educated and those with higher scores on the recovery protection factor, while greater anxiety severity was associated with lower optimism scores. CONCLUSIONS AND SCIENTIFIC SIGNIFICANCE: This study contributes to emerging research on the association between optimism and SUDs. Optimism has not been previously studied among patients in acute, short-term inpatient SUD treatment and doing so may be clinically useful in addressing low optimism as an obstacle to motivation for treatment. Bolstering optimism may be a promising target for intervention and future research.

Operationalizing Engagement With an Interpretation Bias Smartphone App Intervention: Case Series.

BACKGROUND: Engagement with mental health smartphone apps is an understudied but critical construct to understand in the pursuit of improved efficacy. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine engagement as a multidimensional construct for a novel app called HabitWorks. HabitWorks delivers a personalized interpretation bias intervention and includes various strategies to enhance engagement such as human support, personalization, and self-monitoring. METHODS: We examined app use in a pilot study (n=31) and identified 5 patterns of behavioral engagement: consistently low, drop-off, adherent, high diary, and superuser. RESULTS: We present a series of cases (5/31, 16%) from this trial to illustrate the patterns of behavioral engagement and cognitive and affective engagement for each case. With rich participant-level data, we emphasize the diverse engagement patterns and the necessity of studying engagement as a heterogeneous and multifaceted construct. CONCLUSIONS: Our thorough idiographic exploration of engagement with HabitWorks provides an example of how to operationalize engagement for other mental health apps.

Reducing opioid use disorder and overdose deaths in the United States: A dynamic modeling analysis.

Opioid overdose deaths remain a major public health crisis. We used a system dynamics simulation model of the U.S. opioid-using population age 12 and older to explore the impacts of 11 strategies on the prevalence of opioid use disorder (OUD) and fatal opioid overdoses from 2022 to 2032. These strategies spanned opioid misuse and OUD prevention, buprenorphine capacity, recovery support, and overdose harm reduction. By 2032, three strategies saved the most lives: (i) reducing the risk of opioid overdose involving fentanyl use, which may be achieved through fentanyl-focused harm reduction services; (ii) increasing naloxone distribution to people who use opioids; and (iii) recovery support for people in remission, which reduced deaths by reducing OUD. Increasing buprenorphine providers' capacity to treat more people decreased fatal overdose, but only in the short term. Our analysis provides insight into the kinds of multifaceted approaches needed to save lives.

Suicidal motivations among opioid overdose survivors: Replication and extension.

BACKGROUND: Several studies suggest suicidal motivation may contribute to opioid overdose fatalities in people with opioid use disorder. In this study, we sought to replicate and extend prior findings suggesting that a desire to die is common prior to nonfatal opioid overdose in people with opioid use disorder. METHODS: Adults receiving inpatient detoxification and stabilization who reported a history of opioid overdose (N = 60) completed questions about suicidal cognition prior to their most recent overdose. RESULTS: Approximately 45% reported some desire to die prior to their most recent overdose, with 20% reporting they had some intention to die. The correlation between these ratings was of a moderate magnitude (ρ = 0.58). Almost 40% of the sample perceived no risk of overdose prior to their most recent overdose event, suggesting a significant underestimation of risk in this population. CONCLUSIONS: Desire to die was common in adults with opioid use disorder prior to nonfatal opioid overdose events, and 1 in 5 people with a history of opioid overdose reported intention to die prior to their most recent opioid overdose. Careful assessment of suicidal cognition in this population may improve prevention of opioid overdose deaths.

A pilot study of benzodiazepine cue-induced craving.

OBJECTIVES: The misuse of benzodiazepines is a growing concern due to increases in both access to these medications and their associated public health harms, most concerningly risk for overdose when combined with other substances. Although cue reactivity-the subjective and physiological response to cues or reminders of substance use-has been identified for most major classes of substances, it has yet to be studied with benzodiazepines. In this preliminary study, our objective was to assess whether images of benzodiazepines were associated with greater craving and anxiety than neutral images in adults who reported misuse of benzodiazepines. METHODS: We recruited a sample of 38 adults from a substance use disorder treatment setting and administered a standard cue reactivity task using pictorial images along with a battery of self-report measures. RESULTS: Results indicated significantly higher craving and anxiety in response to benzodiazepine relative to neutral cues, with cues eliciting a moderate to high level of craving, on average. Craving was associated with several risk factors for benzodiazepine misuse, including insomnia and distress intolerance. CONCLUSIONS: This preliminary study suggests that benzodiazepine cues can become conditioned to elicit craving responses and that the degree of cue reactivity is correlated with known risk factors for benzodiazepine misuse.

Using natural language processing to improve suicide classification requires consideration of race.

OBJECTIVES: To improve the accuracy of classification of deaths of undetermined intent and to examine racial differences in misclassification. METHODS: We used natural language processing and statistical text analysis on restricted-access case narratives of suicides, homicides, and undetermined deaths in 37 states collected from the National Violent Death Reporting System (NVDRS) (2017). We fit separate race-specific classification models to predict suicide among undetermined cases using data from known homicide cases (true negatives) and known suicide cases (true positives). RESULTS: A classifier trained on an all-race dataset predicts less than half of these cases as suicide. Importantly, our analysis yields an estimated suicide rate for the Black population comparable with the typical detection rate for the White population, indicating that misclassification excess is endemic for Black suicide. This problem may be mitigated by using race-specific data. Our findings, based on the statistical text analysis, also reveal systematic differences in the phrases identified as most predictive of suicide. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the need to understand the reasons underlying suicide rate differences and for further testing of strategies to reduce misclassification, particularly among people of color.

The opioid use disorder core outcomes set (OUD-COS) for treatment research: findings from a Delphi consensus study.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: There is no gold-standard and considerable heterogeneity in outcome measures used to evaluate treatments for opioid use disorder (OUD) along the opioid treatment cascade. The aim of this study was to develop the US National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network (CTN) opioid use disorder core outcomes set (OUD-COS). DESIGN: Four-round, e-Delphi expert panel consensus study and plenary research group discussion and targeted consultation. SETTING: United States. PARTICIPANTS: A panel of 25 members including clinical practitioners, clinical researchers and administrative staff from the CTN, the network's affiliated clinical and community sites and the NIDA Centre for the CTN. MEASUREMENTS: From a pool of 24 candidate items in four domains (biomedical/disease status; behaviors, symptoms and functioning; opioid treatment cascade; and morbidity and mortality), the panel completed an on-line questionnaire to rank items with defined specification on a 9-point scale for importance, with a standard 70% consensus criterion. FINDINGS: After the fourth round of the questionnaire and subsequent discussion, consensus was reached for five outcomes: two patient-reported (global impression of improvement and incident non-fatal overdose); one clinician-reported (illicit/non-medical drug toxicology); and two from administrative records (duration of treatment and fatal opioid poisoning). CONCLUSIONS: An e-Delphi consensus study has produced the US National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network opioid use disorder core outcomes set (version 1) for opioid use disorder treatment efficacy and effectiveness research.